Recommended Superintendent Rating Scale
by Bob Thompson
(Measures Results)
RATING |
DESCRIPTION |
|
| 5 | This function of the district is fully meeting our expectations. Invest no more time and effort than is required to maintain present status. | |
| 4 | We are well satisfied with this function of the district. It could use a bit more attention but not enough to worry about. | |
| 3 | This district function is minimally acceptable. Devote somewhat more time and effort to improving district performance in this area. | |
| 2 | We are not happy with how the district is performing here. Devote considerable more time and effort to improving this function. | |
| 1 | The district’s performance in this area is clearly not acceptable. It must be improved. |
| 1. PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | RATING | |
| 1.1 | There is an up-to-date professional growth plan in each employee’s personnel folder that is signed by the employee’s supervisor. |
|
| 1.2 | Every employee’s personnel folder contains a minimum of one evaluation conducted during the past 12 months and signed by his/her supervisor or the supervisor’s designee. |
|
| 1.3 | Every employee’s personnel folder contains up-to-date documents as specified in administrative/board policy |
|
| 2. STUDENT MANAGEMENT | ||
| 2.1 | Student absenteeism was reduced a minimum of one percent a year until the average daily attendance reached ninety-six percent. |
|
| 3. SCHOOL/COMMUNITY RELATIONS | ||
| 3.1 | The superintendent made at least 12 presentations to civic and/or governmental organizations during the year. |
|
| 4. BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT RELATIONS | ||
| 4.1 | Board packets were delivered to board members at least five calendar days before the board meeting. |
|